Thursday, January 16, 2014

Florida Universities Must Now Allow Guns on Campus

#85 of My Stupid State series

If you read yesterday's post on the Florida Theater Killing and think that the solution here is more guns, then you are either a lunatic... or a Florida legislator. Regardless, I have some good news for you. As of yesterday, Florida Universities must now allow guns on campus.

So think about my grade very carefully Professor.

The link to this breaking story accompanies a video: 1 in every 14 Floridians now carries a gun, the highest in the nation. Go us.

When Florida approached 1 million concealed weapons permits in December of last year, Rick Scott was ecstatic. It was deemed worthy of a press conference so his Agriculture Commissioner could give a formal announcement. (Yes, you read that right. The Agriculture Commissioner because in my stupid state, our Department of Agriculture issues the concealed weapons permits. Since it is most certainly NOT a law enforcement agency, it cannot screen applicants against the FBI's criminal database. Because who would want that.)

The celebration was short-lived. The morning after the press conference was the Sandy Hook tragedy.

Rick Scott took to the airwaves to say... nothing. He even refused to say he wouldn't sell guns to the mentally ill. I thought that day the same thing I do today.. just another day in the gunshine state.

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

FL Movie Theater Killer Tries to Invoke "Stand Your Ground"

#84 of My Stupid State

Cross-posted on Dkos

Curtis Reeves claimed that he was attacked first -- by a bag of popcorn. So when popcorn was thrown at him he responded the way you would expect any elderly Floridian would: gunning the guy down with a .380 semi-automatic. Chad Oulson, a husband and father, paid for that lack of phone etiquette with his life. (Serves him right, say the comment boards.)

Mr. Reeves claimed he was "in fear" for his life. Saying you were "in fear" is the foundation you need to invoke "Stand Your Ground" (SYG), or the "Shoot First" law as it is known here in Florida.

By charging him with second-degree murder, the Pasco Co. Sheriff has said that he wanted "to make sure" SYG was taken off the table. To put it bluntly, he can't.

Not only can Mr. Reeves try to get off with SYG at trial, FL law experts say he has at least a fair chance if he can convince a judge that he reasonably feared for his life before shooting:

Florida theater shooting: Will suspect's age open door to stand your ground?

“Elderly people are a little bit more vulnerable than regular adults, so what may give a younger person a black eye could mean a cracked skull for a septuagenarian – that’s certainly a factor that may be figured in,” says Bob Dekle, a former Florida prosecutor.

....

"Don't be quick to condemn" Reeves’ response to the popcorn attack, wrote Plant City defense attorney Ronald Tulin on his Facebook page. He noted that Florida law allows deadly self-defense in order to “prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony. Attacking a senior citizen is a forcible felony in Florida.”

As I mentioned in a previous post, perpetrators in Florida have more authority to shoot and kill than U.S. troops have in war.

Worse, it says that anyone can shoot anyone if they "reasonably believe" that they or someone else is in imminent danger. So the burden of proof is highly subjective. We know that throwing popcorn at someone isn't going to kill them; but what is important is if Mr. Reeves can convince a judge that HE reasonably believed he was in danger.

Worse still, people a lot more horrible than Mr. Reeves have gotten off using SYG. The majority of people in Florida who claim SYG have a criminal record. And they have been successful in exploiting the SYG law: 70% of people who claim SYG go free! Mr. Reeves, as far as I can tell, had no criminal record.

If you don't think he could get off here in Florida, think again. People have gotten off using Stand Your Ground after shooting someone laying on the ground, performing gang retaliation with AK-47s which led to a 15-year old's death, threatening unarmed utility workers who walked on a yard, and killing a wife's lover in a jealous rage.

Just google "crazy stand your ground cases" and you'll see what I mean. The Tampa Bay Times keeps a record of Stand Your Ground cases. Floridians shooting people in the back, shooting at people delivering papers, shooting at misinterpreted deaf people, drug dealer shoot-outs, etc. etc. etc.

This ALEC/NRA-written law was inflicted upon us by Jeb Bush, (proving to everyone that a more intellectual W. would have been much worse). Although Rick Scott bears plenty of responsibility. After Trayvon's murder, Rick Scott responded to the outcry by appointing a "task force"--which consisted of ALEC members and drafters of the original bill. Surprisingly, they recommended no changes. Not even a tweak so that people who initiate the confrontation can't later claim they felt threatened. So, you know, if a rapist chases a woman and she knees him he won't be able to shoot her and request SYG protection because he felt "threatened". (I know only a complete idiot would accept that defense... but look where I live folks!) Rick Scott wouldn't even support that one simple change.

The clear racial bias, the unequal application, the fact that homicides have increased while empirical studies have found it simultaneously does not deter crime has not and will not stop Stand Your Ground.

Only changing the regime in Tallahassee will.

I only thank God that this guy didn't have a gun or we'd have another victim to mourn today.

UPDATE: So this just happened today

155 and Counting

Just a note that my list of non-partisan reasons to boot Rick Scott is now up to 155. His flip-flops on transportation and DCF spending, his desire to blow $100 million in taxpayer dollars on tourism advertising (can't the private sector do that if it's such a good idea?), and his dodging of questions from the media are the new highlights.

I don't have to do anything but watch, and he pretty much delivers himself into my hands.


Sunday, January 12, 2014

So Who Is the WORST Florida House Member?

A recent expose I read on how truly awful House GOP member Bill Young was got me thinking... Who is the worst Florida member of the House?

This will be for Florida Congressmen only. I don't want to do this right now for the state delegation because the post would be waaaay too long. Soliciting male prostitutes, legalizing bribery, dwarf-tossing jobs bills, farm photographing felonies, million dollar fines for asking about guns will have to wait when I have time.

I only mentioned current House members-(sorry Foley. sorry West). Again, I don't have time to do an all time top five. Also, although I didn't intend this, all of them are teabaggers:

Trey Radel (R-FL19)

The media here failed to cover how truly awful this guy really is. Trey Radel was born wealthy and entitled. He never attempted to hide his reputation as a colossal partier. A failed actor and comedian, he made a living doing Hate Radio (a big industry here in Florida) and running Spanish porn sites.

He wanted to go to Congress so he did an extreme makeover as a "family values" Republican and won over the easily gullible tea party wing. For his primary, he bought domain names of his opponents to smear them. People who have met him tell me he sounds and acts like a typical frat boy.

He is right-wing to the core: anti-immigrant, anti-education, and anti-poor. In September, he cynically voted for Republican legislation that would allow states to make food stamp recipients pee in cups to prove they're not on drugs. The next month, police busted him on charges of cocaine possession. The Florida teabags still stand by him.

Rep. Ted Yoho (R-FL3)

Right out of the gate, he showed his bigotry. He announce he could support "birther" legislation and thought a tax on tanning beds included in the Affordable Care Act was racist against white people.

Last October he argued that defaulting would be good because it would bring stability to world markets. Soon afterwards, he stated furloughed workers should not receive back pay, but voted for it because he didn't know what "fuloughed" meant.

WaPo ran a feature on him for saying he is against Big Government but supporting the most wasteful cases. He is a strong advocate of sugar subsidies for the sugarcane industry here in Florida which are the definition of big waste the Teabags are supposedly against. This is how Yoho defended them in the WaPo:

“I ran on limited government, fiscal responsibility and free enterprise, but when you’ve got programs that have been in place and it’s the accepted norm, to just go in there and stop it would be detrimental to our sugar growers.”

Gus Bilirakis (R-FL9)

Typical rubberstamp teabagger who wasn't going to make this list because despite being the standard teabag awful he didn't stand out, except for defending Gitmo by saying conditions were better there than here.

The reason this guy is a special kind of scum to me was he was a member of the "Foley 5" and his response to the cover-up for his buddy Mark Foley's sexual advances toward a 16-year old boy was this: "We have no stance on that right now - we'll worry about that after we win." Scuzzball.

Steve Southerland (R-FL2)

Insensitive gasbag invoked the shooting of Gabby Giffords to make the case that his salary of $174,000 per year as a representative was “not enough".

Vern Buchanan (R-FL16)

Named Most Corrupt Congressman several years running.

Since 2010, 11 individuals and corporations tied to Rep. Buchanan have been fined for illegal conduit contributions to his campaign. He came under investigation by the House Ethics Committee because one of his former business partners said the congressman pressured him to sign a false affidavit to cover up his role in the scheme.

He has lied about his income on his financial disclosure forms, has been accused of tax evasion and fraud, and used campaign donations to take lavish trips.

Go here to vote on the poll. You can also leave a message in the comments.

Friday, January 10, 2014

How Unpopular is Rick Scott? Christie Coming to Florida Next Week for "Positive Reinforcement"!

#82 of My Stupid State

Only Rick Scott could look at someone involved in a serious scandal of political retribution and think "I gotta get THAT guy to help me!"

And because Chris Christie can't think of anything more helpful in rebuilding the shattered trust of his state than flying to Florida to raise campaign funds, this happened today:

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who dominated politics and cable TV news this week, is headed to the Sunshine State. He's coming to Florida next week to help raise campaign cash for Gov. Rick Scott, who is seeking re-election, according to the publication National Journal.

It's a standard move for a high-level politico, like Christie, who's thinking of running for president.

....

National Journal said Christie would headline fundraisers next weekend in Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach and Orlando.

You would think Christie would be seen as pretty toxic at this point. But THIS> IS> FLORIDA!:

"We always welcome Gov. Christie to Florida," said state House Speaker Will Weatherford, another top Florida Republican. "An unfortunate situation has taken place and he's addressed it. He's not hiding from it. I think he handled it well."

Yeah, he's doing just great!

From the same article: State Senate President Don Gaetz, which the article names as one of the highest ranking Republicans in the state:

"Gov. Christie has got some image problems right now but I think he has a lot of admirers in Florida. People like his New Jersey style, and hopefully he will be of some positive reinforcement to Gov. Scott."

That's right... Senator Don Gaetz, one of Rick's biggest supporters, thinks that Chris Christie is needed for postive reinforcement of Rick Scott!

And what the heck does this say about what Christie must think of Rick Scott? People now associate Christie with making "Buono voter's children" inhale fumes for four hours out of sheer political spite... so what better way to make himself look better than having his picture taken with Gov. Toxic.

Hey, I may be cruel and petty, but at least I'm not THIS guy!

And Christie would have a good point. After all, its not like he's responsible for the largest Medicare fraud case in US history. And Christie always knows he can count on Florida to put corruption in perspective. We are so bad Christie is coming here to look good--and Rick Scott, who has had record resignations in his administration due to scandal/corruption, welcomes him with open arms.

Christie is his kind of people.

Thursday, January 09, 2014

Rick Scott's 2800 Pound Dog and Pony Show



I just updated my list of non-partisan reasons to dis-elect Rick Scott, since I’ve reached 150 of them now. #149 had to do with his delay in picking a lieutenant governor – though to be fair, given the last one he had, Rick Scott may be doing us a favor by not picking a new one.

The 150th reason (which ends up being #144 in my numbering) is the subject of this posting. Here it is:

144) Rick Scott has tried to impress voters with a shallow citation of how many regulations he has deleted.

Scott and his campaign say that they deleted 2800 regulations from the books. This is a big number used in an attempt to impress voters, but it lacks the most important considerations: Why was it a good thing to get rid of each of these 2800 regulations? Were they all bad? (Are lawmakers that incompetent?) Did Scott delete any useful or good regulations? Are any of them just out of date (and if so, why should Scott tout this as a serious accomplishment)? The big number is nothing but a gimmick as it stands.

I’m sure most of you have seen lists of “stupid laws.” You know what I mean: Stuff like, “In New Brunswick it’s illegal to spit on an emu.” We have a good laugh at these, but have you ever asked yourself why anyone would pass such a law?

Well, it may have been a joke, but it’s also possible that someone passed it for what seemed like a good reason. Someone may have actually spit on an emu, which then turned and kicked that someone in the jaw. A law probably wasn’t needed, of course, but laws and regulations that seem silly may have had a perfectly legitimate concern behind them.

As I said in the description, Rick Scott flashes that big number (“2800 regulations, whoa! He must really care about our freedoms!”), but unless and until he explains why each and every one of those 2800 regulations deserved deletion, it’s nothing but show.

Sure, some may have been bad. But how many were good, or served some good purpose, and should not have been deleted? Given Scott’s haywire attitude towards so many other issues, you might want to ask if he deleted some things that were meant to stop harm or even death.

Maybe a few were outdated. (“You can’t park your velocipede in a school zone.”) That’s fair game for deletion, but Rick Scott deserves no credit for getting rid of things like that. It doesn’t serve any purpose other than to save an inch of column space somewhere.

If I can, I’d like to find a list of those 2800 regulations, and see what they were. You can be sure Scott himself didn’t carefully read or consider all 2800 before he swiped them with his pen. All he was after was that big number. In the meantime, be sure and tell people not to fall for Scott’s 2800-pound dog and pony show.

Wednesday, January 08, 2014

Minimum Wage is the "Black Teenage Unemployment Act". Yes, it was on FoxNews.

Crossposted on DailyKos

Where else would you hear such a stupid, bigoted statement?

Art Laffer is a Fox News regular who they always trot out to defend the failed trickle-down economic experiment. He meets Fox's requirements: He supports taxes on poor people but not rich people. He hates the minimum wage. He's a a con artist. And to top it off, he's a bigot.

"The minimum wage makes so sense whatsoever to me. I mean, honestly, it's just the teenage.. the BLACK Teenage Unemployment Act"

I dropped my jaw when I heard that.

But if you were waiting for the Fox News bobblehead, in this case Jenna Lee, to call him out on that--you would be... not surprised. She ignores his statement completely and instead fawns all over his "new ideas". She was the "moderator" of this deep intellectual discussion between two men, because Fox is fair and balanced. On one side, you had the far rightwing nutjob. The other was Art Laffer.

By the way, this is what other guy who wasn't Art Laffer said in response:

I certainly agree with Art that we should LOWER the minimum wage for teenagers. I also think we should lower the minimum wage for the long-term unemployed.

I think you can all join me in saying... WHAT??..

Jenna Lee played the airhead role very well, looking confused when the men were talking, complaining she needed a calculator and couldn't keep up with the discussion, and getting her basic facts wrong (no, Laffer didn't work "in different administrations"--just Reagan. And that was one too many).

The bottom line is that Fox and their conservative guests know their audience. There is no subject that you can't sprinkle in some bigotry to appeal to their fears and biases. You name it: minimum wage, economics, immigration, gun control, etc. Heck, Megyn Kelley found a way to give a nod to bigots over freaking Santa Claus!

Fox News viewers know LESS than people who watch no news at all. But intellectual discussions and real news were never the purpose of Fox "News". It was always to appeal to the Republican base by playing to their stereotypes and fanning their fears; which in turn inspires them to fight to keep the plutocracy in power.

It is my hope that in my lifetime we can one day look back on the Fox News era with the same disgust as we do the McCarthy era, and wonder in awe just how many Americans could have been so fooled.

Tuesday, January 07, 2014

Rick Scott's Last Job Application?



To start this post, let me reveal the 147th reason I’ve added to my list of reasons Rick Scott doesn’t deserve re-election:


Rick Scott is oblivious to the difficulties an average unemployed person has in finding a job.


I won’t formally post this one in the list on my blog (Rick Scott Must Go) until I get enough to reach 150. But it does raise a question. First, though, let me explain the background.


When asked what he planned to do about the dysfunctional CONNECT (DEO) website, Scott offered a clueless reply, which reads as follows: 


"The state's unemployment website has been a disaster, what are you doing to make sure this gets solved?" Brown asked Scott.



"First off, the most important thing we can do is help people get jobs," said Scott. 


"What do you want to say to the people who can't pay their bills right now because of this?" Brown asked.



"Again, my biggest job is to make sure people can get a job. We have 279,000 job openings in the state. We're recouping money, holding money back from Deloitte to make sure it gets better quickly," said Scott.



My analysis for the listing is:


"Scott answers as though all one of the unemployed has to do, is walk outside and snag one of those 279,000 open jobs. He does not even consider the fact that many of those jobs have literally hundreds of applicants, dozens of them qualified. He also does not consider that the unemployed are competing for jobs with others who are still employed, but are looking for a new job because they don’t like their current one. Finally, it is a point of fact that there are still at least three unemployed people in Florida for every job available. Even if all 279,000 of those jobs were filled, we’d have about 550,000 unemployed people left who would need unemployment benefits. Scott clearly has lost touch with what it is like to have to beat the path to look for work."


This made me wonder, in fact, when the last time was that Rick Scott did have to look for a job the way most of us do. By that I mean, searching listings, filling out applications, and interviewing.


Actually, that’s hard to say.


As a kid, he had some nasty jobs as a fry cook, selling TV Guides, and as a phone booth cleaner. He enlisted in the Navy after high school, back in 1970. While in the Navy he and his wife saved money so they could buy a donut shop. The donut revenues paid his way through law school, and he became an attorney. In 1987, he and a partner had enough money to buy a hospital. That was the start of HCA. And then we know about Solantic, which he also started. (I got all this information from this article.)

So…when was the last time Rick Scott actually had to look for, and interview for, a job?


Possibly, he may have interviewed to join a law firm at some point. But if he didn’t, it looks like he hasn’t been through the process since…what? Did he interview for that phone booth cleaner job, maybe? Or, the one selling TV Guides? (I’d like to have heard his answers to, “Why should we hire you?” on that one.) 


Bottom line, Rick Scott hasn’t walked the job search trail most of us walk, since at least the mid-80s. He has no idea what it’s like to check the want ads, to fill out applications, to pound the streets and work the phones and be rejected repeatedly.


And this is someone who touts himself as a “jobs governor”?


No, he’s out of touch. And that’s yet one more reason Rick Scott must go.


**


As a bonus, here’s a comment on the latest effort by Florida Republican Party honcho Lenny Curry to insult the intelligence of Florida voters, which will also make my list as the 148th reason.

Curry, said "As Congress votes today to address cybersecurity concerns with Obamacare, Governor Rick Scott was right from the beginning when he raised privacy and security problems over aspects of this health care bill…Yet, Charlie Crist has dismissed these problems, embracing a bill that puts the privacy of Floridians' personal information at risk."


Wait a minute.


First of all, Scott formerly opposed the "pill mill" database for the same reasons -- then flip flopped and supported it.


Second, Scott didn't seem too concerned about such problems when he hired Deliotte (with its proven bad track record) for the DEO website, which had randomly handed out people’s Social Security numbers. Whoops.


And where, may I ask, has Crist "dismissed" these problems? Can we have a quote? Curry didn’t seem to have one.


No, the bill in question (the Affordable Care Act) hasn’t put the privacy of people at risk; at worst, the troubled implementation of it has, same as with the DEO website. But with that DEO website spitting out people’s Social Security numbers, Scott and Curry had best stop throwing rocks in their house before they break the walls.

Sunday, January 05, 2014

Today, 900 Rich People No Longer Have to Pay Into Social Security

Crossposted on Dkos
You and I, who are struggling to make ends meet, will be paying into social security in perpetuity. Not so for the top .00001% of which our economy is rigged. These 900 of the richest of the rich don't have to pay Social Security taxes for the rest of the year. That's because of an incredibly stupid law that says you cannot tax after $117,000--and since this top elite has already made that much by now, they, unlike the rest of us, get the rest of the year free from Social Security taxes because.... something.

The taxable maximum makes the Social Security payroll tax regressive, meaning that low earners pay a MUCH HIGHER share of their earnings in taxes than high earners. But that's fair because..... something. Boosting the taxable maximum would completely fix the system’s financing. Eliminating the cap entirely would make Social Security solvent for the next 75 years without cutting any benefits, without raising the age, and without effecting the earnings one iota of 95% of all Americans, and would hardly affect the top .00001% at all.

This story showcases a Korean War Veteran delivering pizzas to make ends meet. We are already in a serious retirement crisis: Social Security was supposed to be part of a three-legged stool for elderly Americans. Pension, supplemented by 401ks, supplemented by Social Security was supposed to be our safety net. Pensions have all but disappeared. 401ks are woefully inadequate (I had to tap into mine for health care issues... but that is another issue altogether). Social Security was never meant to the primary lifeline for seniors, yet that is what it has become. Living entirely off of Social Security will keep you below the poverty line, and yet the republicans, led by Koch-funded groups, are pushing the solution to CUT Social Security benefits rather than expand it.

David Koch is spending hundreds of millions of dollars in the fight to cut SS benefits. Keep in mind that he makes $3 million an hour. Granted, this is investment income, which means it isn't taxed at all. If it were earned income, he would have met his cap at 2 minutes and 21 seconds after midnight. The bottle of champagne he drank from to ring in the new year was worth almost half of the maximum allowable.

(Yet that asshat still refuses to tip the help).

He is supported by overpaid CEOs who make up 70% of those 900 people. Their earned income is so high they have already hit the table cap on January 3rd, and they have accumulated MASSIVE retirement fortunes. Yet they support cutting Social Security even though, without any awareness of the irony, they helped contribute to this crisis by successfully shifting the burden of retirement savings to their employees.

The arguments against even raising the cap is flimsy; and again, mostly coming from think tanks funded by the Kochs or University Economic Departments they have bought (I'm looking at you Florida State and Florida Gulf Coast).

The main argument is that raising the cap would somehow "discourage work" and thus cutting benefits is the more proper solution. Yes, because the wealthiest CEOs obviously must work thousands of times harder than their employees to earn thousands of times their salary.

Elizabeth Warren is one of the few fighting to expand, not cut, Social Security. It is more than soluble if the wealthiest among us will at least contribute the same percentage as the rest of us.

Remember this the next time you are told we have to cut "entitlement" programs.











Thursday, January 02, 2014

140+ Reasons Why Rick Scott Must GO!



Yesterday, to ring in the new year, I unveiled something special, and readers of The Seminole Democrat can help make it even better.

At the link at the end of this entry, you’ll find a posting on my own blog, Rick Scott Must Go! It’s a list of 146 non-partisan reasons why Rick Scott deserves to be voted out of office. (They’d also make a nice list for why he deserves to be recalled, if only we had a recall function here…sigh.) I also posted it on my Facebook page.

Why non-partisan?

Because Rick Scott is a menace to the well-being of all Florida citizens – regardless of political views. And those of us who live here and still possess faculties of reason need to unite in spite of partisan differences, and show that someone like Rick Scott will not be tolerated in the governor’s office.

What can you do?

I’m a pretty good researcher. But I’m sure I missed a few things. Please check the list out, and see if you can find any mistakes, or if you can think of anything to add. If you do think of something I can add, please write me at indiethinker777@gmail.com and let me know. I will want some sort of documentation, like you see in the listings now: Preferably from a mainstream Florida media source, like one of the newspapers. 

Also, when you submit something, remember that the list is intended to be non-partisan. Yes, many voters from partisan camps have reason to be angry with Scott; even the Tea Party people (sounds like some alien Grade B movie group, doesn’t it?) are upset with him over a few things by this time. Scott is nothing if not an equal opportunity offender, which is about what you’d expect from someone whose only principles are green and come in denominations. But as I said, all thinking and caring citizens of this state need to unite in purpose if we’re going to unseat this monster. So I prefer to keep the list non-partisan.   (Maybe I can make some “partisan” lists later.)

I’d like to get some feedback for a while, and then see what can be done about getting this listing around. Please accept my thanks in advance for any suggestions!


My thanks, again, to the Seminole Democrat’s My Stupid State series, and the archive at ricksscottsucks.us, for providing so much of the material I used to create the listing.