Maybe I'm missing something here...If I am, please enlighten me in the comments section...
But I think this is SOOOOO simple.
All we need to do is have debate on two, TWO, tax cuts packages.
Call the first: Obama's Middle Class Tax Cut (for those making under $250,000)
Call the second: Bush's Upper Class Tax Cut Extension (for those mkaing over $250,000)
Everybody wins.
We DO NOT have the second without the first. No tax cuts for millionaires without a tax cut for the middle class first.
That way each has a fair vote. The conservadems who want to vote for the rich one can do so...after the vote on the middle class one. If they and the GOP want to add $700 BILLION to the deficit to give $100,000 tax break to multi-millionaires...go for it.
Mitch McConnell says he has all 41 rethugs lined up to fillibuster if they aren't together. FOR GOD'S SAKES.. LET HIM! "Give Em Hell Harry" Reid, (who would be more aptly named "Please don't hit me Harry"), should demand that if they want to fillibuster, they go on the floor and actually do a damn fillibuster on the MIDDLE CLASS TAX CUT.
It will fail. Miserably. The GOP will be in lose-lose...in one motion they will simultaneously be seen as stopping a middle class tax cut and fighting for a tax cut for millionaires. If they cave, which is likely, they will be forced to cede the victory to the Democratic Congress.
Harry is being wishy-washy on this as usual. My God, if I didn't think that Nevada deserved to suffer under that crazed teabagging loon Sharon Angle, I would be happy to see Reid go and be replaced by a smart Democrat with a spine like Chuck Schumer.
Pelosi has been showing some spirit, but she so far hasn't committed to vote on any tax proposals before the election.
Now FAUXNews is smelling blood in the water and has on its front page right now: Expiring Tax Cuts Hit Americans at Every Income Level
In the words of Jon Stewart.. HOW CAN THE DEMOCRATS F*&^ THIS UP??
Contact Harry Reid:
http://reid.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm
Contact Nancy Pelosi
http://www.speaker.gov/contact/
Two packages... two votes... VICTORY. Simple, right?
Showing posts with label Nancy Pelosi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nancy Pelosi. Show all posts
Friday, September 17, 2010
Monday, May 18, 2009
Scapegoating Pelosi: R U Kidding?
This is your plan? Really? Deflect your complicity with torture by attacking NANCY freaking PELOSI?
Did Nancy Pelosi ever order torture?
Did she order waterboarding on Gitmo detainees to get a non-existant link between Al Qaeda and Iraq?
Did she write "legal" memos justifying torture?
Did she sign off on them?
Even she did speak out, would it have made one iota of difference to BushCo.?
None of the important points, like the actual torture, upsets the GOP. No, they are upset that the House leader would dare question something that came from the CIA.
That is the real outrage here. Except, of course, when they do it....
Did Nancy Pelosi ever order torture?
Did she order waterboarding on Gitmo detainees to get a non-existant link between Al Qaeda and Iraq?
Did she write "legal" memos justifying torture?
Did she sign off on them?
Even she did speak out, would it have made one iota of difference to BushCo.?
None of the important points, like the actual torture, upsets the GOP. No, they are upset that the House leader would dare question something that came from the CIA.
That is the real outrage here. Except, of course, when they do it....
Saturday, April 21, 2007
WHO is cutting off funding??
I was furious when I found out that GOP Congressmen, supported by the Bush administration, visited Syria right before Nancy Pelosi, while another accompanied her to Syria. Nary a word from Nancy, other high-ranking Dems, or the media on the hypocrisy of the Bushies bashing Nancy for doing the same thing they support GOP members doing.
And it is happening AGAIN. I keep hearing the right-wing wacko pundits, along with the Dynamic Dumbasses of Bush and Cheney, crying to everyone that Democrats want to cut off funding for the troops in Iraq.
Here's the score folks:
The Democrats sent Bush a funding bill worth over a hundred BILLION dollars to continue funding his misguided adventure! Just this time, instead of the blank check he is used to getting, it requires strategic withdrawals beginning 120 days out--which is MORE than enough time to give his so-called "surge" the chance to work. Experts outside and inside the White House say we should know by summer's end anyway; although everyone outside the White House (besides Baghdad Bob McCain) has already stated the obvious---it's too little, too late.
And by the way, this IS what the AMERICAN people are demanding. Don't they get a say in this?
Bush is threatening to VETO funding for the troops. Draft-dodgers Bush and Cheney have already showed thier contempt by cutting off funding for their benefits, exposing them to predatory lenders, allowing them to fight without the support and armor they needed, and then allowing them to be treated in squalor when they inevitably got hurt as a result. Not to mention (mis)leading them into war based on lies and forcing them to stay to moderate a civil war for no other reason than to save face.
So, my fellow Dems, I ask you-- why the hell are WE being stuck with the cutting off funding label?? Why isn't our leadership screaming on the Sunday talk shows that it is Bush/Cheney who will be cutting off funding for refusing to change their failed strategy?
The GOP has showed that Loud and Wrong always trumps Weak and Right. But Loud and Right wins every hand. We have the Right part, how about the rest?
And it is happening AGAIN. I keep hearing the right-wing wacko pundits, along with the Dynamic Dumbasses of Bush and Cheney, crying to everyone that Democrats want to cut off funding for the troops in Iraq.
Here's the score folks:
The Democrats sent Bush a funding bill worth over a hundred BILLION dollars to continue funding his misguided adventure! Just this time, instead of the blank check he is used to getting, it requires strategic withdrawals beginning 120 days out--which is MORE than enough time to give his so-called "surge" the chance to work. Experts outside and inside the White House say we should know by summer's end anyway; although everyone outside the White House (besides Baghdad Bob McCain) has already stated the obvious---it's too little, too late.
And by the way, this IS what the AMERICAN people are demanding. Don't they get a say in this?
Bush is threatening to VETO funding for the troops. Draft-dodgers Bush and Cheney have already showed thier contempt by cutting off funding for their benefits, exposing them to predatory lenders, allowing them to fight without the support and armor they needed, and then allowing them to be treated in squalor when they inevitably got hurt as a result. Not to mention (mis)leading them into war based on lies and forcing them to stay to moderate a civil war for no other reason than to save face.
So, my fellow Dems, I ask you-- why the hell are WE being stuck with the cutting off funding label?? Why isn't our leadership screaming on the Sunday talk shows that it is Bush/Cheney who will be cutting off funding for refusing to change their failed strategy?
The GOP has showed that Loud and Wrong always trumps Weak and Right. But Loud and Right wins every hand. We have the Right part, how about the rest?
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)