Thursday, August 14, 2014

Two Bad Choices for Circuit Judge (18th Circuit, Group 14), But Boy Did I Pick One

Both tout their work for the NRA (which I guess is a prerequisite to become a judge in Florida these days). Brooke Goldfarb was classless enough to personally attack her opponent in a judicial race for doing her job; and Robin Lemonidis was clueless enough to argue Stand Your Ground for a clear homicide (Michael Dunn). I was just going to say No Endorsement because neither deserve the job, but what set me off was this mailer I received from Goldfarb's own campaign:

Opponent Robin Lemonidis has spent the last 20 years exclusively handling criminal defense matters, representing those accused of MURDER, CHILD MOLESTATION and OTHER FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR CRIMES.

(Caps were hers.)

I immediately became outraged at this statement--coming from a judicial candidate no less. Defense attorneys and public defenders are a critical part of our entire, revolutionary American judicial system. The idea, which I should not have to explain to someone who went to Harvard, is that prosecutors give everything they have to convict the accused, and the defense lawyer gives everything they have to free them. Every fact and piece of evidence that could be presented would have been presented, and the outcome is based on both sides giving it their all. This is as fair a system that anyone has come up with in hundreds of years. The outcomes are not always fair, but no one can say the process isn't.

To argue that the defense attorneys should be berated because of their huge role in this system is reprehensible.

The key word here is the word "accused". How dare she represent those accused of felonies and misdemeanors! If you or I are ever accused of a crime, we would call a lawyer. That's kind of how this works.

So I guess only innocent people should be represented by a defense attorney? Well, how the hell do we know they are innocent, Brooke? If only there was some sort of "trial" to determine innocence....

This means two things, Goldfarb is either extremely ignorant or worse, willfully tarnishing a critical role outlined in our founding documents for a slimy, disingenuous smear campaign. I don't care much for Robin Lemonidis, but I can't fault her for trying to use the stupid SYG law that gives many killers a way out. That's a problem with the actual law, which we desperately need to fix by throwing out the incumbents in my stupid state's executive and legislative branch. This is a big reason we need turnout in the midterm elections.

If there was a third option, I'd pick that person. But there isn't. This is a stunningly insulting line of attack, and for that I recommend voting against Brooke Deratany Goldfarb. Not much of an endorsement for Robin Lemonidis, but I'm going with the lessor of two bad choices.

4 comments :

  1. If you don't like living in a state that allows law abiding citizens to defend themselves against thugs, why don't you move to a state like NY, where the law requires you to let your mugger/rapist/murderer perform their crime in safety?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. despite the propaganda you've allowed yourself to be fed by your willful ignorance, no one is against carrying arms to defend yourself. we do oppose a poorly written law that says anyone can shoot anyone if they are afraid.

      I can't wait until open carry nuts run into Stand Your Ground nuts and you two sets of morons can slaughter each other

      Delete
    2. instead of spewing NRA garbage, let me ask what the living potato does your rant have to do with this article?

      The Constitution is very clear on people having the right to defense in a trial... or do you wingnuts only capable of reading up to the 2nd amendment because words are hard???

      Constitution is for READING, not misspelling on signs...

      Delete
    3. A bit late here, but this article is so outrageously ill informed. First Lemonidis has never done work for or claimed to have done work for the NRA, she simply is a member of the NRA as many Americans are that believe they have the right to own firearms. Secondly how and when did she claim ANY defense for Dunn? If my memory is correct she actually represented Mr. Dunn for about 10 days! Nice try with your propaganda but you should actually do some research before you make blanket claims based on no actual facts.

      Delete