There are people on this planet that I just despise. Hypocrites deserve to be smacked. But Bristol is a special kind of stupid.
She is a proud moron, like her parents. She's a lousy parent herself, who thinks its utterly hilarious that her undisciplined 4-year old swears at his relatives. She is not known for anything except being the offspring of a famous idiot, and for having premarital sex--and then having the unmitigated gall to tell women that she's now righteous and they should follow her lead.
NOW she has weighed in on the Duck Dynasty controversy, because everyone in America wants to know what Bristol thinks.
On her facebook she slams the LGBT community
in a post entitled "Dear Liberals, sometimes free speech feels uncomfortable":
I think it's so hypocritical how the LGBT community expects every single flippen person to agree with their life style. This flies in the face of what makes America great — people can have their own beliefs and own opinions and their own ways of life.
"I hate how the LGBT community says it's all about 'love' and 'equality,'" she added. "However, if you don't agree with their lifestyle, they spread the most hate. It is so hypocritical it makes my stomach turn."
Free speech is an endangered species. Those 'intolerants' hatin' and taking on the 'Duck Dynasty' patriarch for voicing his personal opinion are taking on all of us.
The poor man is expressing his "Christian" views, and them gays just won't let him. They are "uncomfortable". Preach the Bible, BP!
By the way, what does it say about premarital sex?
But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel: Then
they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die. Deuteronomy 22:13-21
So if I call for you to be stoned to death, wouldn't I just be preaching my Bible-based view as well?
Somehow, I don't think you nor your ignorant mother would go for that. It's OKAY to attack icky people you don't like, we get that. But why isn't it fair for people to criticize all the idiotic things a Palin says?
Remember when Mama Palin complained on an interview at FoxNews (where else?) on 11.24 that Bashir should be suspended for pointing out the stupid that comes out of her mouth? She didn't scream 1st amendment, she said there was "no punishment of the fella who said these words". The words being of course that the national debt does NOT equal slavery and people who think that are stupid.
Years earlier, same Mama Palin called on people to "start really rising up" against David Letterman which inspired the failed, conservative "Fire David Letterman" rally.
Bristol: Phil said something bigoted, just like that PR exec flying to South Africa. Freedom of speech does NOT mean freedom from consequences. Especially when the consequence is getting booted from a FAKE ASS reality show where everyone dressed like yuppies and were clean-shaven until they decided to act the yokel for their idiotic audience.
Your mom's 15 minutes have been up for more than five years now. YOU, Bristol, never even had that--as much as you've tried. Please crawl back under the rock you came from.
If you care to share your first amendment speech on her facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Bristol-Palin/109696302423164 feel free.
UPDATE: BUT OF COURSE. I posted a few comments asking, for example, how she rectified her mother's comments with her's about Duck Dynasty. The comments were deleted AND I was banned from posting on her Facebook! And that proves my point about these half-wits: hate speech about people they hate is a 1st Amendment guarantee, but criticism of the Palins can't be tolerated.
Banning Phil for a bigoted remark from his show is an unconstitutional outrage, but painstakingly going through posted comments on a facebook page to suppress a different viewpoint is simultaneously ok? Do you see a disconnect here Bristol? Of course you don't. I forget who I'm dealing with.